<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2010 Chevrolet Camaro V6 Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mpgomatic.com/2009/08/02/2010-chevrolet-camaro-v6-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mpgomatic.com/2009/08/02/2010-chevrolet-camaro-v6-review/</link>
	<description>where gas mileage matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:26:35 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 2010 Ford Mustang V6 Review</title>
		<link>http://www.mpgomatic.com/2009/08/02/2010-chevrolet-camaro-v6-review/comment-page-1/#comment-3431</link>
		<dc:creator>2010 Ford Mustang V6 Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 00:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpgomatic.com/2009/08/02/2010-chevrolet-camaro-v6-review/#comment-3431</guid>
		<description>[...] (HP) and 240 foot pounds of torque. Although the Mustang V6 gives up a bunch of HP to both the Camaro and Challenger V6s, Ford’s pony car is significantly lighter than the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (HP) and 240 foot pounds of torque. Although the Mustang V6 gives up a bunch of HP to both the Camaro and Challenger V6s, Ford’s pony car is significantly lighter than the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
