<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009 Dodge Challenger SE MPG Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mpgomatic.com/2009/04/27/2009-dodge-challenger-se-mpg-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mpgomatic.com/2009/04/27/2009-dodge-challenger-se-mpg-review/</link>
	<description>where gas mileage matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:47:10 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 2010 Ford Mustang V6 Review</title>
		<link>http://www.mpgomatic.com/2009/04/27/2009-dodge-challenger-se-mpg-review/comment-page-1/#comment-3437</link>
		<dc:creator>2010 Ford Mustang V6 Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 14:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpgomatic.com/2009/04/27/2009-dodge-challenger-se-mpg-review/#comment-3437</guid>
		<description>[...] 240 foot pounds of torque. Although the Mustang V6 gives up a bunch of HP to both the Camaro and Challenger V6s, Ford’s pony car is significantly lighter than the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 240 foot pounds of torque. Although the Mustang V6 gives up a bunch of HP to both the Camaro and Challenger V6s, Ford’s pony car is significantly lighter than the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2009 Dodge Challenger SE + Ecometer = Better Mileage</title>
		<link>http://www.mpgomatic.com/2009/04/27/2009-dodge-challenger-se-mpg-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2635</link>
		<dc:creator>2009 Dodge Challenger SE + Ecometer = Better Mileage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 23:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpgomatic.com/2009/04/27/2009-dodge-challenger-se-mpg-review/#comment-2635</guid>
		<description>[...] for fuel-efficient driving. We were able to achieve significantly improved mileage results in our 2009 Challenger SE review car when using the Ecometer. With conscientious use, the inexpensive Ecometer will pay for itself in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for fuel-efficient driving. We were able to achieve significantly improved mileage results in our 2009 Challenger SE review car when using the Ecometer. With conscientious use, the inexpensive Ecometer will pay for itself in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
