<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Honda Fit Sport MPG Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mpgomatic.com/2009/02/09/honda-fit-sport-mpg-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mpgomatic.com/2009/02/09/honda-fit-sport-mpg-review/</link>
	<description>where gas mileage matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:49:26 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mpg-o-editor</title>
		<link>http://www.mpgomatic.com/2009/02/09/honda-fit-sport-mpg-review/comment-page-1/#comment-3461</link>
		<dc:creator>mpg-o-editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 02:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpgomatic.com/2009/02/09/honda-fit-sport-mpg-review/#comment-3461</guid>
		<description>@Glen - With the advent of CVTs and other technology, a growing number of modern automatic-equipped cars are rated higher than their manual transmission-equipped versions. 

@Asdf - That used to be the case. It isn&#039;t any more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Glen &#8211; With the advent of CVTs and other technology, a growing number of modern automatic-equipped cars are rated higher than their manual transmission-equipped versions. </p>
<p>@Asdf &#8211; That used to be the case. It isn&#8217;t any more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: asdf asdf</title>
		<link>http://www.mpgomatic.com/2009/02/09/honda-fit-sport-mpg-review/comment-page-1/#comment-3460</link>
		<dc:creator>asdf asdf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 02:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpgomatic.com/2009/02/09/honda-fit-sport-mpg-review/#comment-3460</guid>
		<description>If you cared about MPG you would learn to drive a manual transmission.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you cared about MPG you would learn to drive a manual transmission.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen Meyer</title>
		<link>http://www.mpgomatic.com/2009/02/09/honda-fit-sport-mpg-review/comment-page-1/#comment-3456</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen Meyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 03:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpgomatic.com/2009/02/09/honda-fit-sport-mpg-review/#comment-3456</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m trying to figure out why the Auto 2009 Fit is getting better Hwy MPG than the manual?  Is the auto geared taller at Hwy speeds over the 5 speed manual?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m trying to figure out why the Auto 2009 Fit is getting better Hwy MPG than the manual?  Is the auto geared taller at Hwy speeds over the 5 speed manual?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.mpgomatic.com/2009/02/09/honda-fit-sport-mpg-review/comment-page-1/#comment-3428</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 00:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpgomatic.com/2009/02/09/honda-fit-sport-mpg-review/#comment-3428</guid>
		<description>I have  checked the &quot;average readings&quot; time since last mileage reset, with actual tank fills and don&#039;t find it to be off by much. Certainly not 4-5 Mpg. In a recent trip combined city highway about 80/20 we averaged 42 MPG. A far cry from the 33 highway listed by the EPA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have  checked the &#8220;average readings&#8221; time since last mileage reset, with actual tank fills and don&#8217;t find it to be off by much. Certainly not 4-5 Mpg. In a recent trip combined city highway about 80/20 we averaged 42 MPG. A far cry from the 33 highway listed by the EPA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.mpgomatic.com/2009/02/09/honda-fit-sport-mpg-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2223</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 21:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpgomatic.com/2009/02/09/honda-fit-sport-mpg-review/#comment-2223</guid>
		<description>I have the same Blue Sensation pearl 2009 Fit shown in the video but w/o the Nav &amp; VSA. Its a great little car, has a lot of space on the inside, i love the USB input- i play my songs from a regular 8GB flash drive. 

The mpg i have obtained since purchase range from the lowest of 32mpg to 34.5mpg with about 60% highway/ 40% local. I am expecting better results once the weather warms up and the car is better broken into.  The gauge is always off by 4-5mpg unfortunately, but i still use the gauge while driving to position my foot on the accelerator for best mpg.

Overall, its a great little car for anyone thinking about purchasing one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the same Blue Sensation pearl 2009 Fit shown in the video but w/o the Nav &amp; VSA. Its a great little car, has a lot of space on the inside, i love the USB input- i play my songs from a regular 8GB flash drive. </p>
<p>The mpg i have obtained since purchase range from the lowest of 32mpg to 34.5mpg with about 60% highway/ 40% local. I am expecting better results once the weather warms up and the car is better broken into.  The gauge is always off by 4-5mpg unfortunately, but i still use the gauge while driving to position my foot on the accelerator for best mpg.</p>
<p>Overall, its a great little car for anyone thinking about purchasing one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mpg-o-editor</title>
		<link>http://www.mpgomatic.com/2009/02/09/honda-fit-sport-mpg-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2214</link>
		<dc:creator>mpg-o-editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 01:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpgomatic.com/2009/02/09/honda-fit-sport-mpg-review/#comment-2214</guid>
		<description>@Dave - I relied on the Fit&#039;s Average MPG gauge for the highway mileage, not the real-time gauge.  Combined mileage is determined by tank fills.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dave &#8211; I relied on the Fit&#8217;s Average MPG gauge for the highway mileage, not the real-time gauge.  Combined mileage is determined by tank fills.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.mpgomatic.com/2009/02/09/honda-fit-sport-mpg-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2213</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 01:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpgomatic.com/2009/02/09/honda-fit-sport-mpg-review/#comment-2213</guid>
		<description>I have a 2009 Fit and you can&#039;t trust the auto MPG calculator on the dashboard.  In reality it seems to be about 4 MPG too high depending on how you drive it.  Please, in the future, post MPG estimates based on actual calculations from the odometer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a 2009 Fit and you can&#8217;t trust the auto MPG calculator on the dashboard.  In reality it seems to be about 4 MPG too high depending on how you drive it.  Please, in the future, post MPG estimates based on actual calculations from the odometer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
