<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ford Transit Connect Van</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mpgomatic.com/2008/01/22/ford-transit-connect-van/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mpgomatic.com/2008/01/22/ford-transit-connect-van/</link>
	<description>where gas mileage matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:47:10 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: F M Russell</title>
		<link>http://www.mpgomatic.com/2008/01/22/ford-transit-connect-van/comment-page-1/#comment-3768</link>
		<dc:creator>F M Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 20:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpgomatic.com/2008/01/22/ford-transit-connect-van/#comment-3768</guid>
		<description>Why bother? No Diesel savings, No 4wd limits it to the south.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why bother? No Diesel savings, No 4wd limits it to the south.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJ Joseph</title>
		<link>http://www.mpgomatic.com/2008/01/22/ford-transit-connect-van/comment-page-1/#comment-3401</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpgomatic.com/2008/01/22/ford-transit-connect-van/#comment-3401</guid>
		<description>The SWB model at 6&#039;-2&quot; height will have no trouble with multi-storey parking garages, but the LWB at over 6&#039;-6&quot; will have parking problems.  The local Ford dealer says that only the LWB Connect will be sold in Canada.   It doesn&#039;t matter whether it&#039;s diesel or not (we like gas powered vans for the convenience, especially in winter) but the height may be a deal-breaker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The SWB model at 6&#8242;-2&#8243; height will have no trouble with multi-storey parking garages, but the LWB at over 6&#8242;-6&#8243; will have parking problems.  The local Ford dealer says that only the LWB Connect will be sold in Canada.   It doesn&#8217;t matter whether it&#8217;s diesel or not (we like gas powered vans for the convenience, especially in winter) but the height may be a deal-breaker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S. Petersen</title>
		<link>http://www.mpgomatic.com/2008/01/22/ford-transit-connect-van/comment-page-1/#comment-2940</link>
		<dc:creator>S. Petersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpgomatic.com/2008/01/22/ford-transit-connect-van/#comment-2940</guid>
		<description>Why not Diesel Electric? Used in Trains by GE for years.
Clean Diesel is here why not use it. Could be 35-40 MPG!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not Diesel Electric? Used in Trains by GE for years.<br />
Clean Diesel is here why not use it. Could be 35-40 MPG!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.mpgomatic.com/2008/01/22/ford-transit-connect-van/comment-page-1/#comment-993</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 03:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpgomatic.com/2008/01/22/ford-transit-connect-van/#comment-993</guid>
		<description>Given the dimensions if the interior 143 cu.ft 61/2 length by 49&quot; between the wheel wells and it&#039;s FWD 4-cylinder chassis, does not impress me enough to replace my 109&quot; WB Dodge 1500 Ram Van (has same interior capacity and dimensions as the transit). As usual Ford leaves a more sellable full size Transit van in Europe while we get a light (4900 gvw, the short Dodge van is 6600gvw). Front wheel drive commercial vans just don&#039;t work that well (as we already have had from Dodge&#039;s caravan and Utilimaster&#039;s dodge 6-cylinder Aeromate) If Ford wants to improve its sales give us the real European Transit with diesel power and sell it for under $19K (way cheaper than the overpriced Sprinter) they won&#039;t be able to build them fast enough. As for the Transit Connect; like most recent Fords will sell strong the first year then quickly fall off to nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the dimensions if the interior 143 cu.ft 61/2 length by 49&#8243; between the wheel wells and it&#8217;s FWD 4-cylinder chassis, does not impress me enough to replace my 109&#8243; WB Dodge 1500 Ram Van (has same interior capacity and dimensions as the transit). As usual Ford leaves a more sellable full size Transit van in Europe while we get a light (4900 gvw, the short Dodge van is 6600gvw). Front wheel drive commercial vans just don&#8217;t work that well (as we already have had from Dodge&#8217;s caravan and Utilimaster&#8217;s dodge 6-cylinder Aeromate) If Ford wants to improve its sales give us the real European Transit with diesel power and sell it for under $19K (way cheaper than the overpriced Sprinter) they won&#8217;t be able to build them fast enough. As for the Transit Connect; like most recent Fords will sell strong the first year then quickly fall off to nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ford Transit Connect Van - NY Auto Show</title>
		<link>http://www.mpgomatic.com/2008/01/22/ford-transit-connect-van/comment-page-1/#comment-633</link>
		<dc:creator>Ford Transit Connect Van - NY Auto Show</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 04:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpgomatic.com/2008/01/22/ford-transit-connect-van/#comment-633</guid>
		<description>[...] 143 cubic feet of storage and 6 feet by 7 1/2 feet of floor space, the Ford Transit Connect will carve a sizable niche in a work van market that&#8217;s more than ready for change. As small [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 143 cubic feet of storage and 6 feet by 7 1/2 feet of floor space, the Ford Transit Connect will carve a sizable niche in a work van market that&#8217;s more than ready for change. As small [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Teljeur</title>
		<link>http://www.mpgomatic.com/2008/01/22/ford-transit-connect-van/comment-page-1/#comment-342</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Teljeur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 22:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpgomatic.com/2008/01/22/ford-transit-connect-van/#comment-342</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s about time we got some decent commercial rated minivans. Please, please leave it alone and bring it as a diesel!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s about time we got some decent commercial rated minivans. Please, please leave it alone and bring it as a diesel!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
