<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chevrolet Impala Gas Mileage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mpgomatic.com/2007/11/02/chevrolet-impala-gas-mileage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mpgomatic.com/2007/11/02/chevrolet-impala-gas-mileage/</link>
	<description>where gas mileage matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:09:58 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PeteMT</title>
		<link>http://www.mpgomatic.com/2007/11/02/chevrolet-impala-gas-mileage/comment-page-1/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>PeteMT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpgomatic.com/2007/11/02/chevrolet-impala-gas-mileage/#comment-105</guid>
		<description>Real world observations:

2006 and 2007 Impalas, 3.5 v-6, rented a year apart for 1400+ mile trips.

Speeds kept at posted limits - 65 &amp; 75 on highway and interstate. Full use of cruise, occasional A/C.

Mountain passes through CO, ID, UT, MT, OR.

Average mpg for 2006 - 30-32.
Average mpg for 2007 - 32-34.

Recently tested 2008 LTZ with 3.9. Computer indicated mpg hovering just under 30.

Note that the final drive ratio (like the old &#039;rear end ratio&#039; for FWD) for the 3.5 car is tall - something like 2.79 or 2.89. The 3.9 car is lower - something like 3.29. The rpm&#039;s were noticeably higher at the same speed than the 3.5 car.

While the 3.9 car felt much stronger, it&#039;s not much more powerful, and the lower gearing could account for the better acceleration and lower mileage. The cylinder deactivation didn&#039;t seem to do much.

I&#039;d like to get a 3.9 car and have the shop change it to the final drive ratio of the 3.5 car. Too bad GM doesn&#039;t offer options like that any more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Real world observations:</p>
<p>2006 and 2007 Impalas, 3.5 v-6, rented a year apart for 1400+ mile trips.</p>
<p>Speeds kept at posted limits &#8211; 65 &amp; 75 on highway and interstate. Full use of cruise, occasional A/C.</p>
<p>Mountain passes through CO, ID, UT, MT, OR.</p>
<p>Average mpg for 2006 &#8211; 30-32.<br />
Average mpg for 2007 &#8211; 32-34.</p>
<p>Recently tested 2008 LTZ with 3.9. Computer indicated mpg hovering just under 30.</p>
<p>Note that the final drive ratio (like the old &#8216;rear end ratio&#8217; for FWD) for the 3.5 car is tall &#8211; something like 2.79 or 2.89. The 3.9 car is lower &#8211; something like 3.29. The rpm&#8217;s were noticeably higher at the same speed than the 3.5 car.</p>
<p>While the 3.9 car felt much stronger, it&#8217;s not much more powerful, and the lower gearing could account for the better acceleration and lower mileage. The cylinder deactivation didn&#8217;t seem to do much.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to get a 3.9 car and have the shop change it to the final drive ratio of the 3.5 car. Too bad GM doesn&#8217;t offer options like that any more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
